MUSLIM ANCESTRY – THE ELEPHANT IN THE CHINA SHOP

What kind of insanity would make ‘radical Muslims’ believe that killing others, would bring them 72 virgins?

The leader of the terrorists in Paris and other places are not all what they are purported to be … not “religiously pure” by any stretch of the imagination – drinking heavily, using drugs, abusing women, even prostitutes etc.

In light of “Occam’s Razor” (Definition:  Among competing hypotheses, the one with the fewest assumptions, should be selected.), I came to the conclusion that the key had to be something obvious — “we couldn’t see the forest for the trees.”

Numerous unpopular studies over the years provide a rational conclusion.

It goes back 14 centuries to the prophet Muhammad, but the schism and hate began centuries before, with Isaac and Ishmael, a curse that can be read of in Genesis 16.

And the Angel of the LORD said to her (Hagar): “Behold, you are with child, and you shall bear a son.  You shall call his name Ishmael. … he shall be a wild man; his hand shall be against every man, and every man’s hand against him, and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.”

The hate began there, but the resulting “insanity” was facilitated by Muhammad when he sanctioned inbreeding, 1400 years ago. While inbreeding was prohibited in the Judeo-Christian tradition since the days of Moses, 50 generations later, nearly half of all the Muslims in the world are said to be inbred.

Nicholai Sennels, a Danish psychologist has done extensive research into this little-acknowledged problem of the Muslim communities: the disastrous results of Muslim inbreeding brought about by marrying of first-cousins. He also examines the relevant links to terrorism — which, strongly suggests it is the outcome of this pervasive mental disorder.

Historically, inbreeding has resulted in a high incidence of genetic and mental disorders.  Pakistanis in Great Britain, are only 3% of the population, yet they make up 33% of birth defects of infants — 55% of this group are married to first cousins.

Among Muslims, these problems manifest themselves ten times more often than the rest of the world’s population. Studies in Britain, of Pakistanis are considered politically incorrect … and pointing to them is considered bigotry … but they should be considered objectively.

Still skeptical? Try searching the web for – “Inbreeding in the Muslim Culture”.  This same phenomena also exists in other communities as well – Appalachia, the history of Europe’s royal families, and the Egyptian dynasties; they all exhibited many of the same effects.

This, is sure to be perceived as inflammatory, yet it seems to account for the world’s terrorism.  It also seems unlikely to go away in the Muslim’s world since Muhammad is their ultimate authority on all matters, especially on marriage.  If true, inbreeding may well have done irreversible damage to the Muslim gene pool.

The question now is: “what do we do with this information?”