MEDIA: “Mirror, mirror, on the wall ….”


Ignore titles: Ph.D., journalist, historian, …

McPherson’s blog’s latest attempt at keeping the liberal media alive and somewhat credible, fails – falling flatly on his own mediasword.   

He’s looked in the mirror, and in response to the question “who’s the fairest of them all?”, he’s now received an answer!  

Their industry is dying and he and his cohorts know it …..  

Is he part of the “Journo-list conspiracy”?   I’d bet money on it; his all-too-apparent hate, is indicative of it.   I don’t need to research it; his vitriolic words are enough. 

It’s too bad one does not understand the difference between the tea party members and extremist bigots, … or does he?   Then again, that’s what they do; they lump us all together, tea partiers and the racists! 

note the reflection of a cross in the window

These hate mongers / little fascists, carry water for the other Nazis, calling themselves “media,” they’re not out to report news, nor are they commentators.   

Rather, they’re revealed as hate-filled bigots and lackeys for the Obama administration, the attack dogs, sent in when character assassination is the only tactic left!   They’re there to bring on another pre-holocaust Kristallnacht!  

You can follow their play-by-play action in Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals”!   The book that (on the page that’s right after the dedication to Irene) lauds LUCIFER, himself! 

They’re all about “labeling the enemy” as racists; it helps the ultimate design of the Obama Administration’s  divide and conquer tactic, ….. or they think it does.  

Bigots themselves, all they do is expose the fact that they’re not credible in any forum!  

So much for the typical media la-cucaracha leftists!   Turn on the lights and watch them scurry!

About josiahe

Watching closely, working to understand all I may, in this "Age of Information", even from my limited view, I can see much of what's going on ..... and I oft see it's going to impact all of us which is why I share it. My focus is to expose evil, and to serve my Lord and savior Jesus in whatever way He shows me. If one waits long enough, better writers will come along and comment; it's just that I have so little patience with the evil that lurks among us and I've wasted so much time and now, there is so little left! WELCOME!
This entry was posted in a href="">search engine submission, Fascist, Journalist, McPherson, Media, Nazi, newspapers, Obama, Politics, POTUS and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to MEDIA: “Mirror, mirror, on the wall ….”

  1. James McPherson says:

    Josiah, there you go again, getting oh so much wrong (though I do appreciate the effort, and the link, for anyone who cares to go to my site and see for themselves). Still let me point out a few examples since you went to all the trouble to write it.

    “Is he part of the “Journo-list conspiracy”? I’d bet money on it…”

    And you’d lose. As I’ve pointed out previously, I haven’t been a journalist for more than 15 years, and I don’t know if Journo-list existed then. I’d never heard of it, at any rate, and since my career was spent at weeklies and small dailies, I doubt I’d have been involved, anyway.

    “I don’t need to research it…”

    Perhaps you might want to start, however, before you make silly claims.

    “his all-too-apparent hate … his vitriolic words …”

    Some examples, perhaps? In truth I hate no one, though admittedly I have little respect for those in public life (and there are many on both sides) who lie or put politics above the country as a whole.

    “These hate mongers / little fascists, carry water for the other Nazis…”

    And I’m the one using “vitriolic words”? You brought in Godwin’s law quickly, indeed.

    “that’s what they do; they lump us all together, tea partiers and the racists…”

    So which are you?

    But in fact if you’d actually read the post you link to, you’d see that I expressly said, “there obviously are racists in the Tea Party movement, perhaps in bigger numbers than elsewhere in society,” with the “perhaps” italicized. In other words, I’m making the point that there are racists everywhere, including–but definitely not limited to–in the Tea Party movement. Do you disagree?

    I also make the point that no label can adequately define the “Tea Party,” because in fact there is no single such party–just a lot of groups using the name.

    As for Alinsky “lauding” Lucifer, anyone who has actually read any of Alinky (as opposed to just reading talking points about him) would recognize that as an obvious joke. But it’s interesting that you mention him, since the tactics he discussed in that book have been very effectively (and sometimes the book itself has been promoted) by those in the Tea Party movement.

    On the plus side, you did get two of my three titles right. Thanks for that.

    • josiahe says:

      I was more a fan of Robert’s Rules of Order than of Alinsky’s methods of overthrowing order.

      My reference to the Journo-List was more to elicit how you fall in line with their tactics – which have now been exposed, not meant to be an actual accusation. 🙂 I have no respect for leftists nor others who promote the Obama administration’s leading America into Fascism, destroying our sovereignty ; I just didn’t want you to feel left out.

      As one who actually marched w/ MLK, in a Chicago Polish neighborhood, (until the bottles and rocks came flying / I was young then and less brave than idealistic) but I resent your (snide) question “so which are you?”!

      You’re right though ….. when you mentioned that I too descended into the caustic and vitriolic; I do that when I confront those who seem so egotistical. I guess it’s that you remind me of my brother, who had to prove how intelligent he was – obviously the reason why you rubbed me the wrong way ……

      Re: Saul’s book; I have it here in front of me – I only meant to draw the reader’s attention to the fact that: 1) Obama obviously taught from the book, he was mentored from it, and 2) more importantly, more revealing, ….. the author of that book endorced / lauded Lucifer! It was NOT meant as a joke; he was describing the very first radical ….. I look at it more as, …. “What a recommendation!”

      Are there existing “talking points” re: Alinsky? Oh; I get it; you made that up ….. no one comes up to your level of intellect.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s