NEW CONGRESSIONAL BACKBONE?

 

UPDATE: 

Bi-Partisan?   NOT!    But they’re (members of Congress) are already on the TV news promoting their refusing to fund the closing of GITMO, as such … a 90 to 6 vote!

Don’t bet on it!     Again, . . . it’s not what it seems.   It’s actually a facimile of a backbone – – – what one would look like, . . . if  Congress actually had one!

It’s meant to look as if Congress is fighting the (p)Resident, . . . both Democrat and Republican, lining up against him!

But it’s not real; it’s all a set up, . . . a “Dog and Pony Show” . . . .  it’s meant to hold the supporting coalition together as long as possible – until the crucial, corrupt “Cap and Trade” legislation is passed . . . . push it through fast, and if anyone’s watching . . . . just create a diversion.   Diversions are worth their weight in gold!

Both brands of pirates, . . . Democrats and Republican Congressmen and Congresswomen are lining up to oppose the closing of GITMO!

Yes, but it’s contrived!   It’s made to look as if the (p)Resident is magnanomous – “noble in spirit and willing to compromise”, when he’s not.   

“Closing Gitmo” was never intended in the first place!   It was all a sham!  

As we’ve said before, (p)Resident Obama serves the same people behind the scenes as did George Bush, Bill Clinton, Bush II, yes, even Carter, Johnson, Nixon . . . etc . . . .

The rationale for closing GITMO was never solid in the first place!   It was the “Hate-America-First” crowd that demanded it, . . . a campaign issue that made Barack Hussein look as if his slogan “Yes, We Can”, were real.   

Think about it!  

1. Where is it safer to keep terrorists than Gitmo?   6 feet under, is the only place I can think of!  
2. Why would our (p)Resident want to put terrorists . . . . er, Islamic Extremists, in a prison where the number of converts to Islam is skyrocketing?    Hmmmm makes sense though, . . . . if one were siding with those who want to destroy America!   It would be a perfect “Isolated Training Facility” for future terrorists!
3. One other thing to consider, . . . . enemy combatants, lie those in Gitmo now, captured when they were out of uniform are, . . . by international law, subject to execution.  
4. If they don’t want to be subject to execution, let them form an army and wear a uniform and quit masquerading as peaceful citizens if they want fairness!   So what if they don’t belong to one specific country?   Doesn’t mean they should be able to pretend, and hide behind women and children until we turn our backs!

Now, as the left is growing dissatisfied with the (p)Resident, . . . . the coalition is beginning to show cracks and fragmenting.

Now, it’s the middle-gullible are expected to step up and say something like . . . . ‘in light of the unexpected problems of being unable to find other nations that would ‘hold these terrorists’ this “change” . . . . this re-evaluation, shows that in the face of no better option, the president is flexible and we’re opting to keep Gitmo open’.